Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we compare estimates of the left-right positions of political parties derived from an expert survey recently completed by the authors with those derived by the Comparative Manifestos Project (CMP) from the content analysis of party manifestos. Having briefly described the expert survey, we first explore the substantive policy content of left and right in the expert survey estimates. We then compare the expert survey to the CMP method on methodological grounds. Third, we directly compare the expert survey results to the CMP results for the most recent time period available, revealing some agreement but also numerous inconsistencies in both cross-national and within-country party placements. We conclude by investigating the CMP scores in more detail, focusing on the series of British left-right placements and the components of these scores. * Paper originally prepared for the workshop on “Comparing Data Sets” Free University of Amsterdam, 16 October 2004. Support for this project was provided by the Institute for International Integration Studies (Trinity College) and by a European Commission Fifth Framework Grant (SERD-2002-00061). Expert surveys were carried out while Kenneth Benoit was supported by a Government of Ireland Research Fellowship. We thank Marina McGale for research support and Gail McElroy for comments.
منابع مشابه
Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts
D eriving reliable and valid estimates of the policy positions of key actors is fundamental to the analysis of political competition. Various systematic methods have been used to do this, including surveys of voters, politicians, and political scientists, and the content analysis of policy documents. Each method has advantages and disadvantages but, for both theoretical and pragmatic reasons, p...
متن کاملPlacing radical right parties in political space: Four methods applied to the case of the Sweden Democrats
Within political science, there are numerous methodological approaches to estimating the policy positions of political actors. Such methods are often used to examine party systems as a whole, but little research has been done on testing them in the context of parties that deviate from the political mainstream, such as populist radical right (PRR) parties. This study evaluates four common approa...
متن کاملScaling Policy Positions From Coded Units of Political Texts∗
Applying a coding scheme to discrete text units has long been the most common method for estimating substantive quantities of interest about the authors of these texts, whether for political, social, economic, or other substantive reasons. In political analysis, researchers typically build scales of policy positions from the relative frequencies of text units coded as left versus right policy c...
متن کاملPolicy positioning in the European Parliament
Party politics in the European Parliament (EP) consists of competition between transnational party groups, each consisting of multiple national member parties from the 27 member states of the European Union (EU). Identifying the policy space that these parties inhabit and their ideological positions is both practically and conceptually challenging. In this article we characterize this policy co...
متن کاملScaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts
Scholars wanting to estimate substantive quantities of interest, for example policy positions, from political texts typically apply a coding scheme to discrete text units such as words or sentences. Scales of policy positions, for example a left-right scale of economic policy, are typically built from the relative frequencies of text units coded into different categories. In this paper we reexa...
متن کامل